Showing posts with label Stone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stone. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Movie with Abe: Stone

Stone
Directed by John Curran
Released October 8, 2010

Edward Norton is a fine reason to see any movie. Norton has consistently delivered excellent performances in films like “Primal Fear,” “American History X,” “25th Hour,” and this year’s little-seen “Leaves of Grass.” Even when he’s not acting at his best, he has a knack for picking challenging roles, and he’s usually still leagues ahead of the rest of the performers in his film. Unfortunately, that’s the case in his latest film, the prison movie “Stone,” which positions Norton’s Stone as a prisoner up for parole, Milla Jovovich as his doting wife on the outside, and Robert DeNiro as his retiring parole officer.

Norton invests his all in bringing Stone, an uneducated, talkative criminal, to life. He puts on an accent and an attitude, and often appears as if he’s acting in a completely different film. Part of the reason he stands out so much is due to the fact that the once-great, two-time Oscar-winning Robert De Niro hasn’t truly done emotive acting in at least a decade. Since ending his frequent collaborations with Martin Scorsese, De Niro has mostly taken on roles as grumpy old men with no patience for anyone around them. While this part is a slightly more three-dimensional than that, De Niro’s Jack is quickly established as a despicable antagonist from the first scene, when his younger self (played by Enver Gjokaj of “Dollhouse” fame) threatens to throw his baby daughter out the window if his wife leaves him.

Establishing such a bleak relationship at the start doesn’t give the film much hope, and it definitely doesn’t deliver on its decently sustainable premise. Without sympathy for the main character, any kind of positive thinking has to be directed toward Stone, who, within the confines of the prison, lives in his own little world, and, as a result, his own little movie. Much of Stone’s spiritual awakening is bizarrely shown in a comic manner, weakening its overall effect. What occurs outside the prison’s walls is far less impressive, based almost entirely around a gaping plot hole where Jack mysteriously decides that it makes sense to open up to Jovovich’s Lucetta. Jovovich, who has given terrible performances in films like “The Fifth Element” and “Zoolander,” masks her inability to act here with the fact that she’s playing someone legitimately crazy, which gives her license to do whatever she wants and have it seem fine.

“Stone” doesn’t start off strong, and an unexplained chain of events lead up to even more nonsense that doesn’t make sense and doesn’t offer any kind of fulfilling or enlightening conclusion to the story or the characters. The use of fancy cinematography at the end is too little, too late, and nothing seems clear at the end of the film. These are sloppily-written characters operating in the kind of story that’s been told in a much better way before, and even the presence of actor extraordinaire Edward Norton, not even delivering one of his best performances, can’t hope to save it.

D

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Tuesday’s Top Trailer: Stone

Welcome to a weekly feature here at Movies with Abe, Tuesday's Top Trailer. One of my favorite parts about going to see movies is the series of trailers that airs beforehand and, more often than not, the trailer is far better than the actual film. Each week, I'll be sharing a trailer I've recently seen. Please chime in with comments on what you think of the trailer and how you think the movie is going to be.

Stone – Opening October 8, 2010



Edward Norton’s name in the credits is reason enough for me to see a film. While I’m still missing a few of his early and most recent films, I’m almost always impressed to see who I consider to be my favorite actor on screen. I don’t know when his film “Leaves of Grass,” which is great, is ever going to be released, so this looks to be the next time he’ll be arriving in cinemas. So here you have Edward Norton, one of the best current actors, Robert De Niro, one of the best actors of the 1970s and 1980s, and Milla Jovovich, a three-time Razzie nominee? Up until that point, the movie looks good, but Jovovich’s presence in a film is never a good thing. This looks like the kind of flick that could either be surprisingly good or really, really bad (sort of like De Niro’s abysmal “Righteous Kill”). Sex and blackmail are intriguing and all, but the story can really devolve if not handled properly. I’m hopeful that the talent on both sides of the camera can make it considerably better. Norton was excellent in prison in 1998's "American History X," and he's pretty much terrific in everything that he does. Norton and De Niro were a lot of fun together in 2001’s “The Score,” and this more serious effort should provide a nice reteaming for them. Frances Conroy is also in the cast so that may help to balance out Jovovich being there. Director John Curran has a pretty impressive resume that includes “The Painted Veil” and “We Don’t Live Here Anymore.” And this is writer Angus MacLachlan’s first film since he penned “Junebug,” which was a wonderfully original and winning dramedy. As I mentioned before, this could end up being truly terrible, but I’m hoping for the best. What do you think?