Wednesday Oscar Retrospective: Five to Ten for 2009
Welcome back to weekly feature here at Movies with Abe, Wednesday Oscar Retrospective. Five to Ten is the fifth in a series of projects looking back at the past eight years of the Oscars, dating back to the first ceremony I watched and closely followed.
On the heels of the Academy’s announcement that this coming year will feature anywhere from five to ten films in the Best Picture list, I thought to look back at the most recent decade to determine what number of films would have ultimately earned a slot in the top category. Obviously, this is all guesswork and designed, above anything, to be fun. In the new system, films will need to earn at least 5% of the first-place votes. Feel free to post your thoughts in the comments!

The locks: There’s no question that the five films nominated for Best Director - Avatar, The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds, Precious, and Up in the Air would have made the list.
The close-to-certains: It was popular and beloved enough to have received enough top votes, and therefore Up would likely have managed a spot on the list.
The less likelies: None
The victims: Four very different films might have suffered an unfortunate fate here. The Blind Side was very much a “popular vote” inclusion, and probably wouldn’t have made the list since next to no one predicted it and stole a spot many thought would have been occupied by “Star Trek” or “Invictus.” District 9, as a sci-fi film that wasn’t “Avatar,” would have been sidelined and saved for the technical categories. An Education, a British indie darling, definitely didn’t accumulate the #1 votes that it would have needed in this new system. Ditto A Serious Man, a film that many loved but likely wouldn’t have gained enough traction to merit a spot without ten slots.

Does it change the winner? No. This was always a two-man battle between “Avatar” and “The Hurt Locker,” and not one of the four films that wouldn’t have been included influenced the victory either way.
Which lineup is better? As a big fan of all but the abysmal “The Blind Side,” I’d be tempted to say that the ten-strong list is great, though I didn’t care all that much for “Precious” either. That said, I do think that when something like “The Blind Side” gets a Best Picture nod, things are getting too liberal, and therefore maybe a tighter bunch of nominees is a better idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment